As the Vancouver Canucks went up three games to two against the Edmonton Oilers during both team’s second-round postseason series, it seemed they were poised to clinch the series. However, the Oilers rallied, winning two straight games to knock the Canucks out of the playoffs. One critical factor in the Canucks’ disappointing finish was the performance of one of their best players, Elias Pettersson, who was visibly not at full speed.
Throughout the series, something seemed off with Pettersson. Observing him on the ice, it was clear he wasn’t engaging physically as usual. There were moments where he appeared hesitant, pulling back from collisions that could have won his team the puck. It was evident that his normal, more aggressive play was missing.
Related: What Blueger, Suter, and Lafferty Have Brought to the Canucks
Earlier in the season, Pettersson had spoken about increasing his physicality after gaining offseason strength and weight. Indeed, he had demonstrated an improved physical presence on the ice. However, during the playoffs, this same physical edge was notably absent. Something was wrong.
In the end-of-season press interviews, Pettersson revealed that he had been playing with a knee injury. This injury had prevented him from fully engaging in the physical aspects of the game, hindering his performance significantly. Despite a few solid moments, the Pettersson the fans had come to know was not the one on the ice during those crucial games. His injury was a pivotal reason for the Canucks’ inability to close out the series against the Oilers.
In a recent discussion, Halford and Brough laid out the contrasting viewpoints regarding Pettersson’s injury comments during the Canucks’ end-of-season media day. The injury to Pettersson stirred a fervent reaction from the fan base on social media, prompting the question that Halford and Brough engaged in to begin the conversation: Which side are you on, Pettersson’s defenders or detractors?
The conversation in the video above was engaging because it was tongue-in-cheek. Second, it brought up some critical issues about the nature of social media and how the organization handled the injury.
The discussion shared the perspectives of Pettersson’s defenders, who attributed blame to the Canucks’ medical staff for purportedly failing to care for their star player adequately. On the opposing side were the detractors, speculating that Pettersson’s knee injury was a convenient justification for a…
Click Here to Read the Full Original Article at The Hockey Writers…